Legal Opinion

Arce v. LHM Dodge Ram Avondale

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided March 11, 2024No. 2:23-cv-02267Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Rafael Villegas Arce, No. CV-23-02267-PHX-MTL 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 LHM Dodge Ram Avondale, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Presently before the Court are Motions to Dismiss the Amended Complaint filed by 16 Defendant Citibank, N.A. (“Citibank”) and Defendants Santander Consumer USA, Inc. 17 Santander Drive Auto Receivables, LLC, and Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 18 2023-1 (collectively “Santander”). Plaintiff failed to file any response. The Motions will 19 be granted. 20 I. 21 After suffering a…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Cyrus Ghazali v. John Moran, Sheriff Clark County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API