Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Frontier Communications

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 10, 2012No. A11-0834PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, G. BARRY, Justice.

The issue presented in this case is whether respondent Karl L. Anderson is barred from receiving workers’ compensation benefits because he failed to give timely notice to his employer of a work-related injury. A compensation judge found that Anderson was barred from receiving workers’ compensation benefits because his written notice of injury, given nearly 2 years after Anderson’s last day of work, was not timely and Anderson’s employer, Frontier Communications, did not have actual knowledge that Anderson’s back problems were work-related. The Workers’…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie JayceesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Gillette v. Harold, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Pojanowski v. HartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  4. Balow v. Kellogg Cooperative Creamery AssociationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  5. Issacson v. Minnetonka, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gist v. Atlas Staffing, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
  2. Harbaugh v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  3. Ansello v. Wisconsin Central, Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API