Legal Opinion
Dorsett v. Mogensen
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided February 9, 2023No. 2:21-cv-00985Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 6 NEWTON DORSETT, Case No. 2:21-cv-00985-CDS-NJK 7 Plaintiff(s), Order 8 v. [Docket No. 32] 9 BRIAN MOGENSEN, et al., 10 Defendant(s). 11 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. Docket No. 32. 12 Defendant Mogensen filed a response in opposition. Docket No. 34.1 Plaintiff filed a reply. 13 Docket No. 35. The motion was referred to the undersigned magistrate judge. The motion is 14 properly resolved without a hearing. See Local Rule 78-1. For the reasons discussed below, the 15 motion for summary judgment is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Robin Orr v. Bank of America, Nt & SaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Oscar W. Jones v. Lou Blanas County of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Andres M. Martinez v. G.D. Stanford W. Owen M. Atkinson D. Rockholt J. StovallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Theodore Heinemann, I v. Daniel SatterbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.