Legal Opinion

Muhammad v. County Bank

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 14, 2005PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

877 A.2d 340 (2005)

379 N.J. Super. 222

Jaliyah MUHAMMAD, on her own and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

COUNTY BANK OF REHOBOTH BEACH, Delaware; Easy Cash; Telecash; and Main Street Corporation,[1] Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued March 15, 2005.

Decided July 14, 2005.

Donna Siegel Moffa, Philadelphia, PA, argued the cause for appellant (Williams, Cuker and Berezofsky and Trujillo Rodriguez & Richards, attorneys; Mark R. Cuker and Ms. Moffa, on the brief).

Marc J. Zucker, Philadelphia, argued the cause for the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Muhammad v. County Bank of Rehoboth Beach, DelawareSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  2. Gerald Chamales Corp. v. Oki Data Americas, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2007
  3. Hai Nguyen v. Attorney General New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  4. In re RappaportUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
  5. Glassford v. BrickKicker and GDM Home Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API