Legal Opinion

Consolidated Traction Co. v. Chenowith

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 15, 1898PublishedCited by 9 opinions

On error to the Supreme Court. For opinion of Supreme Court, see 29 Vroorn 416.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court .was delivered by

The Chancellor.

Error is assigned, in the first place, upon the refusal of the trial court to nonsuit the plaintiff below. The proofs exhibited that the plaintiff was the driver of a hook and ladder truck belonging to the Newark fire department, which was drawn by two horses; that the distance from 'the front end of the pole to which the horses were harnessed to the rear end of the ladders, extending back of the truck, was forty-eight feet, and the weight of the truck, with its load, was about seven thousand pounds; that the driver’s seat upon the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bahr v. Lombard, Ayres & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1890

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co. v. HensleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Hayward v. North Jersey Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1907
  3. Jersey City Redevelopment Agency v. KuglerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  4. Ritscher v. Orange & Passaic Valley Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
  5. Migans v. Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API