Legal Opinion

Bahr v. Lombard, Ayres & Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1890PublishedCited by 37 opinions

On error to the Hudson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

G-akrison, J.

The plaintiff was a servant of the- deféndants in the business of refining crude oil, and while at work upon his employers’ premises received injuries, to- recover-damages for which this action was brought. The occurrence by which he was injured is thus described by the plaintiff, the only witness thereto : “ On August 21st, 1882, a pipe which was being fixed exploded and threw me into the yard ;• I came around from the stills; if the stills don’t run properly I have to see to the fires and open the drafts; I saw two men standing there,…

2Cited by37 opinions

  1. Myrlak v. Port Auth. of NY and NJSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  2. Macon Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. CraneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  3. Venditti v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  4. Boyd v. Portland Electric Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Trenton Passenger Railway Co. v. CooperSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API