Legal Opinion

Federal Land Bank of New Orleans v. Curington

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 17, 1936No. 4 Div. 896PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

This is a bill in equity filed by appellee, and seeks to cancel a deed executed by her to her husband dated February 22, 1920, to the extent that it conveys 78 acres of the land described in it, virtually a reformation of that deed.

It is claimed that her husband had deeded to her 160 acres of land, and that he misrepresented to her the contents of the deed of February 22, 1920, in that he said it only reconveyed to him the 160 acres he had deeded to her, whereas it also included her 78 acres.

Her husband applied for and obtained a loan from appellant, and executed a mortgage…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smith v. CookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Boykin v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  3. Key v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  4. Jernigan v. GibbsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  5. Moore v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Redwine v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  2. McCulloch v. RobertsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  3. Jennings v. JenningsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  4. Niehuss v. FordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  5. Goodgame v. DawsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API