Legal Opinion
Maynard v. Kear
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided July 19, 1979No. C75-256PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BATTISTI, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs have presented a claim for relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Secs. 1983, 1985, and 1986, the Fourth, Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, and state common law. Plaintiffs are Thomas Maynard, his wife, Joyce Maynard, and the owners of the apartment building in which the Maynards resided. Defendants are North Olmsted police officers Russ King, Jr., Marion Taylor, and Raymond A. Brow, North Olmsted prosecutor Donald Albenze, the City of North Olmsted, Ohio, and Daniel Kear and Jesse T. Mathusa, who…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. SheahanIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
- Abdullah Dohaish v. Dale TooleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- Landry v. A-Able Bonding, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Coon v. FroehlichDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1983
- McCoy v. JohnsonDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.