Legal Opinion

Joseph v. Holder

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 27, 2009No. 18-3178PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD, Circuit Judge.

This is the second time that Roome Joseph has appealed a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings. The stakes are high for Joseph, as in Pakistan she faces either a forced marriage or the prospect of living as a single Christian woman without familial support, a dangerous path in that country. When we first saw this case, we granted Joseph’s petition for review and remanded to the BIA because it failed to consider Joseph’s argument that her parents’ threat of a forced marriage in Pakistan constituted a changed…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Miller v. HermanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  2. CE Design, Ltd. v. PRISM BUSINESS MEDIA, INC.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  3. Arobelidze v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  4. Moosa v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  5. Zero Zone, Inc. v. United States Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API