Legal Opinion

Brown v. Parker

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1901PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Monroe; Kinne, J. Bill by Harvey H. Brown and others to enjoin John Parker and others from hunting on complainants’ land. From a decree for complainants, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The complainants seek to enjoin defendants from hunting ducks on wet and marshy land adjacent to Lake Erie, near Monroe. The defendants insist that the lands are a part of the bed of the lake, and that the public has a right to hunt and fish upon them. See 1 Comp. Laws, §§ 1265-1267; People v. Silberwood, 110 Mich. 103 (67 N. W. 1087, 32 L. R..A. 694); 1 Comp. Laws, § 1261 et seq.j People v. Warner, 116 Mich. 228 (74 N. W. 705); 2 Comp. Laws, § 5875 el seq.j Act No. 171, Pub. Acts 1899. The Federal government surveyed the premises in question, which are bounded by the meander lines of Lake…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Cragin v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. French v. FyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Beard v. FederySupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  5. Niles v. Cedar Point ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1899

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hilt v. WeberMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. State v. Lake St. Clair Fishing & Shooting ClubMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  3. St. Helen Shooting Club v. MogleMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Kavanaugh v. BairdMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Putnam v. KinneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API