Legal Opinion
Conner v. City of Santa Ana
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 1, 1990No. Nos. 87-6683, 88-5510 to 88-5512 and 88-5536PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEEZER, Circuit Judge:
These consolidated appeals stem from the City of Santa Ana’s removal of automobiles from the Conners’ private property after the Santa Ana City Council determined that the automobiles constituted a public nuisance. The parties appeal and cross-appeal from the judgment, grants of summary judgment, the granting of permanent injunctive relief, and from the award of attorneys fees. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
City of Santa Ana police were advised that the Conners were storing several old and seemingly inoperable automobiles on their property. Believing that the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Zimmerman v. City of OaklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Zimmerman v. City Of OaklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Coleman v. WattCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Easyriders Freedom F.I.G.H.T. v. HanniganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- John Corp. v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.