Legal Opinion

State v. Reiners

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 10, 2003No. C7-01-1001PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HANSON, Justice.

Following a jury trial, respondent Cecil John Reiners was found guilty of assault in the first degree for striking Jose Padilla in the head with a wooden board. The court of appeals reversed the conviction, concluding that the trial court committed reversible error by denying Reiners’ peremptory challenge of an African-American prospective juror and, as a result of that error, Reiners was entitled to a new trial. We affirm the decision of the court of appeals.

Reiners owns Bloomington Steel and Supply, a company that fabricates support structures used in the construction…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Vasquez v. HillerySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Strauder v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. State v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  2. State v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  3. State v. CarridineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  4. State v. GomezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  5. State v. DobbinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API