Legal Opinion

Betts v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 10, 2022No. Civil Action No. 2021-1861Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMANDA BETTS, Plaintiff Civil Action No. 21-1861 (CKK) v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendant MEMORANDUM OPINION (August 10, 2022) Plaintiff Amanda Betts brings this employment discrimination action against Defendant Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“Defendant” or “WMATA”). Plaintiff’s five- count Complaint raises the following claims: (1) hostile work environment based on sex (female), disability (pregnancy), race (African-American), and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API