Legal Opinion

Underwriters at Interest v. SCI STEELCON

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided June 26, 1995No. 1:94-cv-00467PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERT HOLMES BELL, District Judge.

In this action, Plaintiffs seek a declaration that they are not obligated to pay on two policies which they issued to defendant SCI Steelcon. Before the Court at this time is Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment.

I

SCI Steelcon (Steelcon) is a steel erection contractor. During the relevant time period involved in this case, Steelcon had two policies with Plaintiffs providing liability insurance. The first was a primary policy of comprehensive general liability insurance. That policy provides in part:

Underwriters will pay on behalf of the insured all…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Chrysler Corp. v. Skyline Industrial Services, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
  3. James W. McCarty v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  4. Fresard v. Michigan Millers Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Bundy Tubing Company, a Michigan Corporation v. Royal Indemnity Company, a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Desert Mountain Properties Ltd. Partnership v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  2. Radenbaugh v. Farm Bureau General InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Corder v. William W. Smith Excavating Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Allendale Nursing CentreDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1998
  5. Cincinnati Insurance v. Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API