Underwriters at Interest v. SCI STEELCON
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT HOLMES BELL, District Judge.
In this action, Plaintiffs seek a declaration that they are not obligated to pay on two policies which they issued to defendant SCI Steelcon. Before the Court at this time is Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment.
I
SCI Steelcon (Steelcon) is a steel erection contractor. During the relevant time period involved in this case, Steelcon had two policies with Plaintiffs providing liability insurance. The first was a primary policy of comprehensive general liability insurance. That policy provides in part:
Underwriters will pay on behalf of the insured all…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Chrysler Corp. v. Skyline Industrial Services, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
- James W. McCarty v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Fresard v. Michigan Millers Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Bundy Tubing Company, a Michigan Corporation v. Royal Indemnity Company, a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Desert Mountain Properties Ltd. Partnership v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- Radenbaugh v. Farm Bureau General InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- Corder v. William W. Smith Excavating Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Allendale Nursing CentreDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1998
- Cincinnati Insurance v. Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.