United States v. Rosendin Electric, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW-
INGRAM, District Judge,
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
1. On May 14, 1987, the above-entitled action was remanded by the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to this court to hold an evidentiary hearing “for the limited purpose of determining whether [the government] violated Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(d) or 6(e).” The evidentiary hearing having been held, the court now renders its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.
2. On November 3, 1986, a one-count indictment was filed against the defendants, described briefly at Findings of Fact Numbers 1 to 6, alleging that they…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. MechanikSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. MarianiDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2000