Legal Opinion

Richert v. City of South Portland

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 3, 1999PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDana, J.

[¶ 1] Joan Richert appeals from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Cole, J.) affirming the decision of the City of South Portland Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) that Charles and Virginia Secor were the “resident occupants” of a South Portland building and could therefore engage in the “home occupation” of letting rooms. 1 Ric-hert contends, inter alia, that the Secors are not the “resident occupants” of the dwelling during the approximately ten months of the year they are living in Connecticut. We agree, and vacate the judgment.

[¶ 2] The Secors have maintained their…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Driscoll v. GheewallaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  2. Kasper v. Town of BrookhavenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Town of Union v. StrongSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  4. Redevelopment Authority v. StepanikCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Lewis v. Town of RockportSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sawyer Environmental Recovery Facilities, Inc. v. Town of HampdenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  2. Springborn v. Town of FalmouthSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  3. Turbat Creek Preservation, LLC v. Town of KennebunkportSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  4. Herrle v. Town of WaterboroSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  5. Herrle v. Town of WaterboroSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API