Legal Opinion
Driscoll v. Gheewalla
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided March 3, 1982PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUFRESNE, Active Retired Justice.
The appellants, Russi K. and Edith Ghee-walla, took the instant appeal from an order of summary judgment in the Superior Court, York County, vacating a decision by the Zoning Board of Appeals of Saco (Board) granting the appellants a zoning variance. We reverse the summary judgment and order the zoning variance reinstated.
The Gheewallas own an undersized lot on the corner of Spring and Surf, unaccepted streets in the City of Saco, abutting property owned by the appellees, J. George and Nancy Driscoll. Hoping to build a house on this lot for their own personal…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Milwaukie Co. of Jehovah's Witnesses v. MullenOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- Golden v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
- Whittle v. Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
- Russell v. Tenafly Bd. of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Fiorilla v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Barnes v. Board of Sup'rs, DeSoto CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
- In Re Application of CarrierSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- New England Whitewater Center, Inc. v. Department of Inland Fisheries & WildlifeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
- Shackford & Gooch, Inc. v. Town of KennebunkSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.