Legal Opinion

State v. Ingraham

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1998No. 97-076PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Regnier

¶ 1 Gregory Lloyd Ingraham appeals from a judgment and commitment of the Twentieth Judicial District Court, Lake County, based on a jury verdict convicting him of negligent homicide, criminal endangerment, and criminal trespass to property. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

¶2 Ingraham advances twelve issues on appeal, reordered as follows for purposes of our discussion:

¶3 1. Did the District Court err in admitting evidence of various medications detected in Ingraham’s blood and urine, as well as those found in his car?

¶4 2.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Brown v. North American Manufacturing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. StringerMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. GollehonMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Simonson v. WhiteMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. CristMontana Supreme Court · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Henricksen v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. BuckMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. HarrisMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. VlietHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. AyersMontana Supreme Court · 2003

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API