Legal Opinion

Fourth Amendment Implications of Military Use of Forward Looking Infrared Radars Technology for Civilian Law Enforcement

Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel

Decided March 4, 1992Published

1Opinion of the Court

Fourth Amendment Implications of Military Use of Forward Looking Infrared Radars Technology for Civilian Law Enforcement Forw ard L ooking In frared R adars (FL IR ) reconnaissance o f structures on private lan d s does not constitute a search w ithin the m eaning o f the Fourth A m endm ent. D epartm ent o f D efen se personnel engaged in such surveillance would not be su b ject to liability for dam ages in a constitutional tort action. March 4, 1992 M em orandum O p in io n f o r t h e General C o u n sel D epartm ent o f D efen se This memorandum is in response to your request for further…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API