Hill v. Armour Fertilizer Works
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Complaint; from city court of Asbburn — Judge Tipton. December 24, 1916.
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, J.
1. If a court of competent jurisdiction, in dismissing a suit on demurrer, necessarily decides upon the merits of the case, the decision, as between the same parties and upon the same subject-matter, may be pleaded in bar of another suit. Fain v. Hughes, 108 Ga. 537 (33 S. E. 1012); Black v. Black, 27 Ga. 45; Gray v. Gray, 34 Ga. 499. But where a former suit was brought in a name which did not import either a natural person, a corporation, or a partnership, and in which the character of the plaintiff’s entity was not shown, and where on review of that case this court held that the demurrer…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Luther v. ClaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Fain v. HughesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Gray v. GraySupreme Court of Georgia · 1866
- King v. Shepard & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Hill v. Armour Fertilizer WorksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
3Cited by15 opinions
- Haas & Howell v. GodbyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Carter v. Marble Products Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Scott v. Kelly-Springfield Tire Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Dixon v. Cassels Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Scott v. Powell Paving Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.