Legal Opinion

Hill v. Armour Fertilizer Works

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 19, 1917No. 8426PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Complaint; from city court of Asbburn — Judge Tipton. December 24, 1916.

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, J.

1. If a court of competent jurisdiction, in dismissing a suit on demurrer, necessarily decides upon the merits of the case, the decision, as between the same parties and upon the same subject-matter, may be pleaded in bar of another suit. Fain v. Hughes, 108 Ga. 537 (33 S. E. 1012); Black v. Black, 27 Ga. 45; Gray v. Gray, 34 Ga. 499. But where a former suit was brought in a name which did not import either a natural person, a corporation, or a partnership, and in which the character of the plaintiff’s entity was not shown, and where on review of that case this court held that the demurrer…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Luther v. ClaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Fain v. HughesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  3. Gray v. GraySupreme Court of Georgia · 1866
  4. King v. Shepard & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  5. Hill v. Armour Fertilizer WorksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Haas & Howell v. GodbyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  2. Carter v. Marble Products Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  3. Scott v. Kelly-Springfield Tire Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  4. Dixon v. Cassels Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  5. Scott v. Powell Paving Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API