Hill v. Armour Fertilizer Works
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Action on guaranty; from city court of Asbburn — Judge Tipton. March 28, 1913.
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.
The plaintiff in error was sued upon a note and an alleged contract of guaranty. The contract of guaranty, however, was not set out in the petition or attached thereto. He demurred to the petition, on numerous grounds, and his demurrer was overruled. Exceptions to the ruling on the demurrer were preserved pendente lite. The trial resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $778.49. The defendant moved for a new trial, which was refused, and error is assigned here both upon the judgment overruling the demurrer and upon that refusing a new trial. In the view we take of the case it is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Dalton Marble WorksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Mattox v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Clark Bros. v. WycheSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Mutual Life Insurance v. Inman Park Presbyterian ChurchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Saint Cecilia's Academy v. HardinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Eslinger v. HerndonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Smith v. Commissioners of Roads & RevenueSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Hill v. Armour Fertilizer WorksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Bremen Foundry & Machine Works v. BoswellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
- South Cobb Builders Supply, Inc. v. Southern Concrete Products Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.