King v. Shepard & Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Petition. Before Judge Henry. Ployd superior court. January term, 1897.
1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, P. J.
1. An agreement in writing containing admissions of fact, though made for the purposes of a particular trial and after-wards withdrawn, is nevertheless admissible in evidence against the party making such agreement, in favor of the opposite party, in a subsequent trial of the same case. Such agreement is not, however, absolutely binding and conclusive upon the party by whom it was signed; but it is his right to disprove, rebut or explain any statement therein contained. See Luther v. Clay, 100 Ga. 236.
Submitted February 23, Decided March 25, 1898. Petition. Before Judge Henry. Ployd superior…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Luther v. ClaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Carter v. Marble Products Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Hill v. Armour Fertilizer WorksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Burgess v. FriarSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Bailey v. WarlickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.