Legal Opinion
Hollow v. Hollow
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 19, 2002PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
James W. McCarthy, J.
The above-captioned matter is before this court pursuant to plaintiff Janice Hollow’s motion for (1) extension of time to serve process (CPLR 306-b) and (2) alternate service (CPLR *692308 [5]). Oral argument was heard by this court on July 19, 2002, at which time decision was reserved. Having reviewed the submissions of the plaintiff, for the reasons set forth below, this court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law.
Findings of Fact:
In September of 1999, the defendant relocated to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia where he is employed…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International Interlink, Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International InterlinkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Leader v. Maroney, Ponzini & SpencerNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Citigroup Inc. v. City Holding Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Dobkin v. ChapmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Safadjou v. MohammadiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Baidoo v. Blood-DzrakuNew York Supreme Court · 2015
- Snyder v. Alternate Energy Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 2008
- Kulpa v. JacksonNew York Supreme Court · 2004
- Montesdeoca v. KramsCivil Court of the City of New York · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.