Legal Opinion
Kulpa v. Jackson
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 26, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Robert F. Julian, J.
relief requested: Defendant Ashforth moves for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Defendant Fell cross-moves to dismiss the complaint. Plaintiffs cross-move for an extension of time to serve process upon defendant Fell and/or to consolidate the actions and to strike affirmative defenses related to service.
holding: The stipulation of discontinuance in the first action is not res judicata barring the second. Defendant Fell was successfully served with process under the Hague Convention. Plaintiffs are granted relief in the alternative in the form…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. SchlunkSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Leader v. Maroney, Ponzini & SpencerNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Kleeman v. RheingoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Anton v. AmatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- De Zego v. BruhnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bumpus v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Voelker v. Bodum USA, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Kulpa v. JacksonNew York Supreme Court, Oneida County · 2004