Legal Opinion
Citigroup Inc. v. City Holding Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 31, 2000No. 99 Civ. 10115(RWS)PublishedCited by 221 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants City Holding Company (“City Holding”) and City National Bank of West Virginia (“City National”) have moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) or to transfer venue of this trademark infringement action to the Southern District of West Virginia. Plaintiffs Citigroup Inc. and Citicorp (collectively, “Citigroup”) have opposed these motions and have moved to enjoin prosecution of a duplicative lawsuit filed in that district by one of the defendants. For the reasons that follow, the motions by…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Robertson-Ceco Corp., United Dominion Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Zippo Manufacturing Co. v. Zippo Dot Com, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by221 opinions
- Best Van Lines, Inc. v. Tim Walker, Docket No. 04-3924-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. American BuddhaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Research Automation, Inc. v. Schrader-Bridgeport International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- FC Investment Group LC v. IFX Markets, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Phillips v. Reed Group, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
216 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.