Legal Opinion · Dissent

Berger v. General Motors Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 7, 1987No. Docket No. 91017Published

1DissentDanhof, C.J.

I respectfully dissent. I do not believe that it can be concluded that the wcab did not find the written hearsay statements of Dr. House unworthy of belief. By concluding that the plaintiff had not fulfilled his burden of proof, the wcab implicitly concluded that it was not convinced by Dr. House’s statements.

In addition, the wcab is not required to accept hearsay statements, such as were presented in the instant case, even if they are unrebutted.1 While the majority correctly notes that this Court has held that hearsay statements may be considered by the wcab when no objection is raised,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Koschay v. Barnett Pontiac, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
  2. White v. Revere Copper & Brass, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Fergus v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Holford v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Kido v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API