Koschay v. Barnett Pontiac, Inc.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Submission of this granted appeal from the administrative denial of workmen’s compensation has concentrated our attention, not upon the merits of plaintiff’s claim but upon a developing misunderstanding of the statutorily assigned function of the appeal board and that of the appellate courts when review is obtained pursuant to original § 12 of procedural part 3 of the statute. 1 The issue here is the same as in 1919 Borck v. Simon J. Murphy Co., 205 Mich 472, where the appellant claimant challenged the Industrial Accident Board’s opinion. That opinion was quoted by the Court at 473:
“ ‘Without…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Zaremba v. Chrysler CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
- Larzelere v. LarzelereMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Borck v. Simon J. Murphy Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
3Cited by31 opinions
- Kostamo v. Marquette Iron Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1979
- DeNardo v. Fairmount Foundries Cranston, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
- Gilbert v. MaheuxSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Braxton v. Chevrolet Grey Iron Foundry Division of General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
- McClain v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.