Griffith v. Wright
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. E. D. Benson, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Reavis, J.
Respondent (plaintiff) commenced an action to recover judgment on nine promissory notes executed by appellant for the sum of $25 each, together with eight per cent, interest from the date of execution of the notes. ■ The usual allegations were made which entitled respondent to her judgment upon the notes. Appellant answered, admitting the allegations of the complaint, but set up as an affirmative defense, and by way of counterclaim, a note in the sum of $388, executed and delivered by respondent to Mary J. Wright, and the assignment of such…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- City of Cincinnati v. RiceOhio Supreme Court · 1846
- Simpson Centenary College v. BryanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sapp v. LifrandArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- Nunn v. JordanWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- Conran v. White & Bollard, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1946