Legal Opinion

Griffith v. Wright

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1899No. 3235PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. E. D. Benson, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Reavis, J.

Respondent (plaintiff) commenced an action to recover judgment on nine promissory notes executed by appellant for the sum of $25 each, together with eight per cent, interest from the date of execution of the notes. ■ The usual allegations were made which entitled respondent to her judgment upon the notes. Appellant answered, admitting the allegations of the complaint, but set up as an affirmative defense, and by way of counterclaim, a note in the sum of $388, executed and delivered by respondent to Mary J. Wright, and the assignment of such…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Cincinnati v. RiceOhio Supreme Court · 1846
  2. Simpson Centenary College v. BryanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sapp v. LifrandArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Nunn v. JordanWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Conran v. White & Bollard, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API