Legal Opinion

Sapp v. Lifrand

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1934No. Civil No. 3452PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

Annie Lifrand, hereinafter called plaintiff, brought suit against Bazell Motor Company, a corporation, and various individuals, hereinafter called defendants, on a promissory note given by the defendants to E. T. Malich and by him assigned to plaintiff. The note was secured by a realty mortgage, and plaintiff asked for the usual foreclosure decree thereon. After the filing of the suit, Sidney Sapp, the duly appointed, qualified and acting administrator of the estate of E. Y. Malich, was by the court allowed to file a complaint in intervention. The gist of this complaint was that Malich, at…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tevis v. RyanArizona Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Tevis v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Nixon v. BeardIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Sullivan v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
  5. Greer v. LatimerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. SchantzArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Alexander v. O'NEILArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Larson-Hegstrom & Associates, Inc. v. JeffriesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  4. Cannon v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  5. State v. ArellanoArizona Supreme Court · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API