Legal Opinion

Graham v. Inskeep

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 10, 1967No. Docket 765, 766PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolbrook, P. J.

These are automobile-pedestrian negligence actions brought by Dorothy M. Graham individually and as next friend for her minor son, Michael S. Graham, as plaintiffs, against Madelene W. Inskeep, defendant. The eases were consolidated for trial before a circuit court jury. Verdicts of no cause of action were rendered in both cases.

Plaintiffs moved for a new trial and upon its denial have appealed to this Court raising three questions for review: (1) Did the trial court err in its instructions relating to the “assured clear distance ahead” statute? (2) Did the trial court abuse its discretion in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Fraser v. JennisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Canfield v. City of JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Fowler v. HoffmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Schattilly v. YonkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Luckhurst v. SchroederMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. GrissomMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Parlove v. KleinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Pociopa v. OlsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. People v. GrissomMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  5. People v. GrissomMichigan Supreme Court · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API