People v. Grissom
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMarilyn Kelly, J.
This case presents the question whether newly discovered impeachment evidence can constitute grounds for a new trial and, if so, under what circumstances. Defendant seeks a retrial on the basis of the newly discovered impeachment evidence. The trial court and the Court of Appeals concluded that this evidence cannot be used as a basis for granting a new trial because, in part, it is impeachment evidence. The Court of Appeals also concluded that the evidence did not warrant a new trial because if it were admitted on retrial, there was no reasonable chance of a different result.
We hold that…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- People v. ArmstrongMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
- People v. BarbaraMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
- People v. CressMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
- Delvin White v. Jane Coplan, Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- People v. ArmstrongMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- People v. BlevinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
- People of Michigan v. Kendrick ScottMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
- People of Michigan v. Johnny Ray KennedyMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
- Baugh v. CampbellDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.