Legal Opinion

People v. Grissom

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 2012No. Docket 140147PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarilyn Kelly, J.

This case presents the question whether newly discovered impeachment evidence can constitute grounds for a new trial and, if so, under what circumstances. Defendant seeks a retrial on the basis of the newly discovered impeachment evidence. The trial court and the Court of Appeals concluded that this evidence cannot be used as a basis for granting a new trial because, in part, it is impeachment evidence. The Court of Appeals also concluded that the evidence did not warrant a new trial because if it were admitted on retrial, there was no reasonable chance of a different result.

We hold that…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. People v. ArmstrongMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
  3. People v. BarbaraMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  4. People v. CressMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Delvin White v. Jane Coplan, Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. People v. ArmstrongMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. People v. BlevinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. People of Michigan v. Kendrick ScottMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
  4. People of Michigan v. Johnny Ray KennedyMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Baugh v. CampbellDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API