Legal Opinion

Chandler v. . Marshall

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 18, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

Tbis is an action in claim and delivery, instituted by plaintiffs to recover, as mortgagees or by virtue of an unregistered retained-title contract, tbe possession of a pair of mules, sold by plaintiffs to one George Burnett, now deceased. On tbe trial, defendant contended that be bad purchased tbe mules from George Burnett, for value and without notice of tbe plaintiffs’ lien, and gave evidence to tbis effect.

Over objection, tbe plaintiffs were allowed to offer tbe testimony of two witnesses, tending to show wbat George Burnett bad said to them on different occasions, and subsequent to tbe…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Satterwhite v. . HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1852
  2. Barker v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  3. Printing Co. v. . HerbertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. Asheville Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  2. Hager v. . WhitenerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  3. Bunting v. . SalsburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Williams v. . YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API