Legal Opinion

Booher v. Criswell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 13, 1975No. 18693PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLAUDE WILLIAMS, Chief Justice.

Harold W. Criswell, d/b/a Harold W. Criswell and Associates, brought this action against Jim Booher, “individually and d/b/a Booher and Associates,” to recover on a sworn account. The trial court granted Criswell’s motion for summary judgment, and Booher appeals. We reverse and remand.

Criswell attempted to bring suit on a sworn account in compliance with Tex.R. Civ.P. 185, to recover in the sum of $2,382.87, arising from his performance at the request of appellant, of engineering consultant services. Booher’s verified answer denied liability in the capacity in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gibbs v. General Motors CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  2. McCamant v. BatsellTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Copeland v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  4. Hilton v. Musebeck Shoe Company, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Robertson v. Rexall Drug & Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Harley-Davidson Motor Co., Inc. v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  2. Juarez v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Bluebonnet Express, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of WausauCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  4. Special Marine Products, Inc. v. Weeks Welding & Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Belknap v. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API