Legal Opinion

Robertson v. Rexall Drug & Chemical Company

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 2, 1966No. 16776PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RENFRO, Justice.

Appellee herein, Rexall Drug Company, a corporation sued appellant, C. T. Robertson, under a guaranty agreement executed by Robertson on October 12, 1962, in which Robertson “guaranties payment of any and all sums that may become due and payable ot Rexall Drug and Chemical Company from * * * Publix Stores, Inc., and I agree to promptly pay any and all said sums upon maturity and demand, whether evidenced by open account, notes or otherwise. This is intended to be and is a continuing guaranty and applies to any and all sums which may become due to Rexall Drug and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Meaders v. BiskampTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. McCamant v. BatsellTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Eng v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  4. Duree v. &198tna Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. McCollum v. MayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Copeland v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  2. Nichols v. Acers CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  3. Boysen v. Security Lumber Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. Trinity Universal Insurance Co. v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. Booher v. CriswellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API