Legal Opinion

Hilton v. Musebeck Shoe Company, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 30, 1974No. 12099PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Chief Justice.

Appellee Musebeck Shoe Company sued appellant on a sworn account. Appellant by a sworn answer stated that the goods and wares allegedly sold him were in fact sold to Hilton Foot-So-Port Shoes, Inc., a Texas Corporation chartered and existing during the period of time alleged by appel-lee, and still an existing corporation and further that appellant was not liable in the capacity in which he was sued nor liable in any other capacity.

By way of a special exception appellant directed the court’s attention to appellee’s original petition contending that the exhibit attached…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McCamant v. BatsellTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Copeland v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  3. Nichols v. Acers CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  4. Williamsburg Nursing Home, Inc. v. Paramedics, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  5. Starlight Supply Company v. FerisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Airborne Freight Corp. v. CRB Marketing, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Jones v. Ben Maines Air Conditioning, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Boysen v. Security Lumber Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. Steves Sash & Door Co. v. WBH InternationalCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. Booher v. CriswellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API