Ramet v. State

OPINION

By the Court,

Douglas, J.:

Appellant Daniel Anthony Ramet was convicted of first-degree murder. On appeal, Ramet raises several points of error allegedly committed during his trial, only one of which merits detailed consideration.1 Ramet contends that the testimony concerning his refusal to consent to a search of his home, taken together with the prose*197cutor’s comment on it, was violative of his Fourth Amendment rights.

We conclude that the district court erred in allowing testimony and argument regarding Ramet’s invocation of his Fourth Amendment right. However, the error in admitting the…