Legal Opinion

Oseland by Oseland v. Crow Wing County

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 29, 2019No. A18-1550Published

1Opinion of the Court

GILDEA, Chief Justice.

*747This workers' compensation case asks us to decide whether Auto-Owners Insurance Group ("Auto-Owners") owes interest, penalties, and expenses to the heirs of relator Richard Oseland on underpaid disability benefits. The compensation judge determined that the heirs were entitled to interest from the date of each underpayment, but that neither penalties nor expenses were warranted. The Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals ("WCCA") affirmed the compensation judge's denial of penalties and expenses but held that the heirs were not entitled to interest. Because we agree with…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hoff v. KemptonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Brewster v. WakefieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  3. Dykes v. Sukup Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  4. Selk v. Detroit Plastic ProductsMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Warner v. ZaiserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API