Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Railroad Commissioners v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 3, 1914PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Original proceedings in Mandamus by the State.

1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, J.

(After stating the facts.)

This proceeding in mandamus is to enforce an order of the Railroad Commissioners requiring the respondent railroad company to provide specified depot buildings for freight and passenger accommodation and also additional sidetracks at a place called “Peters” on respondent’s line of railroad.

Orders duly made by the Railroad Commissioners within their statutory authority to regulate the maintenance and operation of railroads as common carriers, may be enforced in appropriate proceedings, when they are not shown to be illegal or unreasonable. Such orders when duly made…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. North Carolina Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Washington Ex Rel. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co. v. FairchildSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Railroad CommissionersSupreme Court of Florida · 1912
  4. State ex rel. Railroad Commissioners v. LouisvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
  5. State ex rel. Railroad Commissioners v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Chicken'N'Things v. MurraySupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  2. Florida Motor Lines, Inc. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  3. State ex rel. Railroad Commissioners v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1915
  4. State Ex Rel. Taylor v. Union Pacific RailroadIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
  5. State Ex Rel. R. R. Comm'rs v. S. A. L. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1925

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API