Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Norton

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 12, 2005No. 03-17207PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Chief Judge:

The plaintiffs-appellants are siblings who brought this action against the United States claiming that they are entitled to recognition as members of the Table Mountain Ranchería, a federally-recognized Indian tribe, and therefore to share in the revenue of that tribe’s very successful casino near Fresno, California. Although their claim to membership appears to be a strong one, as their father is a recognized member of the tribe, their claim cannot survive the double jurisdictional whammy of sovereign immunity and lack of federal court jurisdiction to intervene in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Richard McNatt v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Gilbert McClendon Bernadine F. McClendon Norman McDanel Connie R. McDanel v. United States of America Colorado River Indian Tribal CouncilCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Alvarado v. Table Mountain RancheriaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Albert Alto v. Kenneth SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  3. Wright v. Colville Tribal Enterprise Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Jeffredo v. MacArroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Jessica Tavares v. Gene WhitehouseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API