Jessica Tavares v. Gene Whitehouse
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge WARDLAW
OPINION
McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:
This appeal tests the limits of federal court jurisdiction to hear a habeas petition brought under the Indian Civil Rights Act (“ICRA”), 25 U.S.C. §§ 1301-1303, where the underlying claim arises not from an actual detention or imprisonment, but instead from a tribe’s temporary exclusion of its own members.1
Congress enacted the ICRA in 1968 in response to a “long line” of federal court decisions exempting Indian tribes from constitutional restraints. See Cohen’s Handbook of Federal Indian Law § 1.07, at 97…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Chafin v. ChafinSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Makah Indian Tribe v. Quileute Indian TribeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- I.M. v. United States Customs and Border ProtectionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2023
- Cantrell v. Pyramid Lake Tribal CourtDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2024
- Chegup v. Ute Indian Tribal Court of the Uintah and Ouray ReservationDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2019
- Chegup v. Ute Indian Tribe of the UintahCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.