Legal Opinion

Jessica Tavares v. Gene Whitehouse

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 14, 2017No. 14-15814PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge WARDLAW

OPINION

McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:

This appeal tests the limits of federal court jurisdiction to hear a habeas petition brought under the Indian Civil Rights Act (“ICRA”), 25 U.S.C. §§ 1301-1303, where the underlying claim arises not from an actual detention or imprisonment, but instead from a tribe’s temporary exclusion of its own members.1

Congress enacted the ICRA in 1968 in response to a “long line” of federal court decisions exempting Indian tribes from constitutional restraints. See Cohen’s Handbook of Federal Indian Law § 1.07, at 97…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  4. Chafin v. ChafinSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Makah Indian Tribe v. Quileute Indian TribeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. I.M. v. United States Customs and Border ProtectionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2023
  3. Cantrell v. Pyramid Lake Tribal CourtDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2024
  4. Chegup v. Ute Indian Tribal Court of the Uintah and Ouray ReservationDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2019
  5. Chegup v. Ute Indian Tribe of the UintahCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API