Legal Opinion

Ridenour v. Furness

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 1989No. 06A01-8903-CV-76PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKER, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Defendant-appellant, James M. Ridenour, Director of the Indiana Department of Natural Resources (the DNR), appeals from a judgment entered on its action to recover the damages sustained from an injunction erroneously imposed in favor of plaintiff-appellees, Clay, Chris and Jeff Furness, Mike Brzinski, Chris Camalick, Clem Cho, Bill Dickerson, John Hart, Lance Kaeding, Howard Westerman, Phil Smidt, Harold Buey, and Tom Mayoch (the fishermen).

We reverse and remand.

STATEMENT OF THE FACTS

For over two decades, the DNR has been actively involved in enhancing and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Campins v. CapelsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Bottoms v. B & M COAL CORP.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Riverside Insurance v. PedigoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Howard D. Johnson Co. v. Parkside Development Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Park v. Moorman Mfg. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lachenman v. SticeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Harlan Sprague Dawley, Inc. v. S.E. Lab Group, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Dennerline v. AtterholtIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Jason Bokori v. Jasmina MartinoskiIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Caleb Sullivan v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API