Legal Opinion

Simms v. Simms

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 9, 1991No. 9024PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.

The plaintiff in this action appeals from the trial court’s denial of her motion for modification of alimony. She claims that the court improperly determined that the defendant’s receipt of certain moneys in exchange for United States treasury bonds was not income and therefore did not warrant modification of her alimony award. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

The following facts are necessary to our resolution of this appeal. The marriage of the parties was dissolved on September 24, 1979. The judgment of dissolution *232incorporated the terms and provisions of a settlement agreement entered…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Darak v. DarakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. Hardisty v. HardistySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  3. Grinold v. GrinoldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  4. Albrecht v. AlbrechtConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  5. Casanova v. CasanovaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Crowley v. CrowleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  2. Simms v. SimmsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  3. Denley v. DenleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  4. Muller v. MullerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  5. Schorsch v. SchorschConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API