Legal Opinion

Olson v. Rose

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1944No. 29300PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallery, J.

The plaintiff brought an action for damages arising out of an automobile accident. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

The parties differ in their theories of the facts. The jury was entitled to believe that, between 1:45 and 2:00, September 20, 1941, the respondent Olson was a guest in the back seat of a car owned and driven by one J. Victor Falk, which left Aberdeen for Everett, Washington. They stopped at Tacoma for coffee for ten or fifteen minutes. At about 4:25, a collision occurred between the car in which respondent was riding and one driven by appellant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shelley v. NormanWashington Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Douglas v. TwenterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  2. Bergstrom v. OveWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Elmer S. Nelson and Mabel R. Nelson v. Thomas Brames and Marilyn C. BramesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
  4. Zahler v. DittmerWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Bergstrom v. OveWashington Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API