Legal Opinion

Zahler v. Dittmer

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1957No. 33752PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.

From a judgment for the plaintiffs in an automobile collision case tried to the court, the defendants appeal, contending that they were not negligent and that plaintiff Joseph Zahler was negligent in driving over the center line of the highway and that such negligence was a proximate cause of the collision, as a matter of law.

The four findings of fact that bear upon the issues of negligence and proximate cause are as follows:

“II. That the Lowell River Road is an asphalt surfaced public highway about 16% feet wide, . . . which runs in a generally easterly and westerly direction; that the farm…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Warren v. HynesWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Purdie v. BrunswickWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Geitzenauer v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Rumford v. SniderWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Shelley v. NormanWashington Supreme Court · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Leach v. WeissCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  2. Greenwood v. BogueWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Wilson v. WrightWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Nesmith v. BowdenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API