Douglas v. Twenter

COIL, C.

At the outset we rule two motions which were taken with the case.

Respondent’s motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that appellants’ brief violates S.C. Rule 1.08 in that it allegedly does not contain a fair and concise statement of the facts without argument, is overruled.'

Appellants’ motion to strike and expunge from our records respondent’s “Narrative Digest of the Testimony” is sustained. In this connection, we call attention to S.C. Rule 1.08 (c) which provides in part: “The respondent, in his brief may adopt the statement of facts of the appellant, or) if not satisfied…