Legal Opinion
California Fruit Exchange v. Henry
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 3, 1951No. Civ. A. No. 6866PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOURLEY, District Judge.
The matters herein arise under the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act. 7 U.S.C.A. § 499a et seq.
An award was made under the Act in favor of the plaintiff in the amount of $2119.40 with interest from October 22, 1946.
At the first trial, before a member of this Court, now deceased, the award was sustained by the jury. However, a new trial was • granted by the Court. Slip opinion and order filed January-29, 1949.
At the second trial, before this member of the court, the award under the Act was not sustained ’by the jury. However, a verdict was returned and judgment…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ex Parte PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Gold Dust Corporation v. HoffenbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- California Fruit Exchange v. HenryDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
- United States v. Minneapolis, St. P. & S. S. M. Ry. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1916
- Harry Edison Hackworth v. William H. Hiatt, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ryan v. Arabian American Oil Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Brown v. Consolidated Fisheries Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1955
- Nelson v. KerznerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1953