Legal Opinion
Genelink Biosciences, Inc. v. Colby
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 1, 2010No. Civil 09-5573 (NLH)(AMD)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HILLMAN, District Judge.
This case concerns plaintiffs state law-based legal malpractice, negligence and breach of contract claims against defendants for their alleged failure to properly prosecute plaintiffs patent applications in Japan and the United States. Defendants Gary D. Colby and Duane Morris LLP removed plaintiffs ease to this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1338 and 1441, contending that plaintiffs claims arise under the federal patent laws. Presently before the Court is plaintiffs motion for remand. Defendants have opposed plaintiffs motion. For the reasons expressed…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Minton v. GunnTexas Supreme Court · 2011
- Alphonse v. WallerDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
- Byrne v. Wood, Herron & Evans, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Byrne v. Wood, Herron & Evans, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Byrne v. Wood, Herron & Evans, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.