Legal Opinion

Adkins v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 4, 1989No. 158, September Term, 1987PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKWELL, Judge.

Our primary concern in this homicide case involves the propriety of calling an accomplice as a state’s witness in the jury’s presence when it is known by the court and counsel that the witness will invoke the privilege against compelled self-incrimination.

The Petition for Writ of Certiorari presented the following additional issues: (1) whether a recorded conversation between the defendant’s nontestifying accomplice and an undercover informant is admissible as a declaration against penal interest; (2) does the admission of a recorded conversation between the nontestifying…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Roberts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Choi v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  2. Gray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. Simmons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  4. Crosby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. Bhagwat v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API