Bhagwat v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
BELL, Judge.
Today we are asked to consider two questions: (1) Whether the proper procedure concerning the invocation of a witness’s privilege against self-incrimination was followed in the case sub judice; and (2) whether a plea agreement which precludes one co-defendant from testifying at the other co-defendant’s trial violates public policy. These questions are closely interrelated. Treated together, they require that another related issue be addressed: the propriety of the court permitting the privilege to be invoked premised on an invalid plea agreement. This issue necessitates an…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Webb v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Dixon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Gray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Simmons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Hutchins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.