Legal Opinion

Bhagwat v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 16, 1995No. 14PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, Judge.

Today we are asked to consider two questions: (1) Whether the proper procedure concerning the invocation of a witness’s privilege against self-incrimination was followed in the case sub judice; and (2) whether a plea agreement which precludes one co-defendant from testifying at the other co-defendant’s trial violates public policy. These questions are closely interrelated. Treated together, they require that another related issue be addressed: the propriety of the court permitting the privilege to be invoked premised on an invalid plea agreement. This issue necessitates an…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Webb v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Dixon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Gray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. Simmons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  5. Hutchins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API