Richard E. Warner and Virginia A. Warner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SNEED, Circuit Judge:
This case demonstrates that the bureaucratic way in which the Commissioner must gather revenue leaves little opportunity for ad hoc face-to-face adjustments that sometimes are made between individual debtors and creditors.
The appellants’ 1969 federal income tax return omitted certain items of income which, in fact, were reflected on proper W — 2 forms that were attached to the return. The return showed appellants entitled to a refund of $2,070.15. After a false start in which an “incorrect” refund check in the amount of $20.70 was returned by the appellants, the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Rushlight Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. United States of America, United States of America v. Rushlight Automatic Sprinkler Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
3Cited by40 opinions
- Richard D. Bokum, Ii, Margaret B. Bokum v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Ruth Gordon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Clark v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Rodriguez v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
- William J. Beer v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.